SBU Provocateur Against Sundey Adelaja, a Pal of the Soused Lowlife Sasha Sinitsky from Zhytomyr or — Ukrainian SBU – a 'Forge' of Anti-Protestant Cadres!
But! if there’s a criminal component to Sunday, then why the provocateurs?!
Sunday Adelaja’s chief accuser Ivan Bondaruk turned out to be a liar, connected to the SBU
The article from the website of Sunday Adelaja’s church shows the interest, and therefore the bias, of the Ukrainian special service in accusing Adelaja; otherwise, why… provocateurs! (?) (this is while they are dealing with Sunday! — but who’s next?) The article exposes (as you will read below) the fake “well-wisher”-“lawyer” — provocateur of the special services Ivan Bodnaruk and his subsequent “dumping” by the agency, that is, the SBU.
Let’s make a short digression — for edification:
The story of provocateur I. Bodnaruk is reminiscent of the story of another — but a more petty agent-troublemaker, paid provocateur Sasha Sinitsky from Zhitomir, aka “Sivushny-Sasha,” aka “Alex,” aka “Salim,” aka “Straight,” aka “Tarchok” — who was actively used and then, when no longer needed — after a failure, dumped, when he completely botched a big project to discredit the Pentecostals.
SBU informer and provocateur — the lowered pederast-troublemaker in “Butyrka” — Sasha “Tarchok-Sivushny” Sinitsky, set himself up as a denouncer of the Protestant church.
By God’s providence, I and the brothers were given to see the far-reaching anti-Protestant project “Sivushny-Sinitsky” for preparing exaggeration and persecution at the hands of supposedly “disgruntled” believers at its very inception. For this, they pulled out of the dusty — anti-sectarian closet, to discredit everything connected with the Gospel. But!
Beforehand — to be sure, the petty agent-provocateur and supposed “Pentecostal” for discrediting denunciation (simply by his blue-nasty presence) Sasha-Sivushny, nicknamed “Straight” (actually — according to him?!) was lowered by Moscow “comrades” into the letter G — in the corner by the slop bucket, in Butyrka prison, becoming “bent.”
A couple of years ago, the lowered “Tarchok” Sinitsky, also started out all chipper, and now he got in “gratitude” — a boozy, swollen, bloated, twisted mug, thus becoming an alkie — Sasha “Sivushny”! So I. Bodnaruk still has it all ahead of him! Meanwhile, Bodnaruk’s job profile was changed from denouncer of a Nigerian pastor to lobbyist for prostitution in Ukraine! (Now that’s a flight of fancy at the SBU!) After all, training an agent takes a long time, and so when he fails, he gets transferred to another job, where no one knows him.
In the zone, there is a well-known saying explaining the changes in the personality of a lowered convict: “There’s no one more insolent than a pederast!” Here we see the fulfillment of this prison saying firsthand, broadcast on the internet, where the Butyrka lowered-pederast, rapist, snitch, former tarchok Sasha Sinitsky denounces and teaches the church. (But that’s a separate topic) Maybe he repented and God forgave him? If God had truly forgiven him and cleansed him of his sins, then this “sivushny” would not slander on the internet and would leave his KGB masters, to whom he gave his soul. Instead, he fills up the measure of his sins for a dog’s slop.
They lower people in prison, that is, put them in the “corner,” make pederasts of a special contingent of convicts — the faint-hearted, weak-willed (such people, by the way, are easily subjugated by the religious mafia of the Bondaruks, Kotyaks, Radchuks, and other fornicators with the authority of the All-Union Council of Evangelical Christians-Baptists (AUCECB)), various lawless types like Sinitsky, so that they know their place (after all, they’ll never wash off the slop bucket, so the criminals disarm the lawless ones who are ready for anything, including snitching. For lowered ones in the zone often work for the administration), various kinds of imbeciles with Down syndrome (this is to some extent present in the “Sivushny Straight-Bent” with his passionate childhood desire to become a criminal), KGB and cop snitches (this is his recruitment, when he “fooled” the KGB in the army), rapists of women and men (lowered a guy in the army with an accomplice, and hinted at a brutal rape in Moscow, for which he was put in Butyrka). About the initiation ritual into being “lowered” I’ll keep silent.
SBU informer and provocateur — the lowered pederast-troublemaker in “Butyrka” — Sasha “Tarchok-Sivushny” Sinitsky, became a denouncer of the Protestant church, coddled at home on the couch of another secret worker “Bishop” Syrkin — a witness to the laundering of stolen money by Sunday Adelaja. Syrkin was stunned at how the lowered Sinitsky went limp.
You will say, Boris, why are you so strict and unmerciful with these Judases among the Protestants? Very many people were tortured, even to death, many wavered in faith—were tempted and died in their sins—and all because of such provocateurs. On the hands of these people is the blood of the saints. They not only make faces before God
On the website of former Kyiv mayor Leonid Mikhailovich Chernovetsky, one of the news items reads: “The Shevchenkivsky District Court of Kyiv on July 24, 2012, issued a ruling that upheld the claim of Leonid Chernovetsky and declared a liar the ‘chief accuser’ in the case of Sandey Adelaja – Ivan Mikhailovich Bodnaruk.”
The chief accuser of Sandey Adelaja, Ivan Bodnaruk, turned out to be a provocateur and a liar, an SBU agent. The boozy “Tarchek,” just as fresh, harnessed himself to the SBU project, but after a couple of years turned into a swollen, bloated, spiteful sewer worker with a contorted face.
The chief accuser? An astonishing label for a person who calls himself a lawyer. Believers immediately think of their own analogy – in the Bible, this term designates a completely different personality (the devil-Satan), who opposes not only Christians but the Lord God Himself. Regrettably, parallels between these personalities go beyond the name alone.
In fact, many have already seen in news coverage about Pastor Sandey Adelaja of the Embassy of God church this short-cropped man (like Sinitsky and other provocateurs), whom certain “yellow” media, not particularly concerned with their reputation, still call in the old-fashioned way a “lawyer.”
Who is he in reality? A lawyer? An accuser? Just a legal adviser? Let’s try to sort this out.
Visiting the website of this public figure, we see in his biography a lot of information about medals received in Cossack troops, some information about his army service, Cossack achievements, data about his karate belts, and that’s all… rather thin for a “lawyer involved in a number of high-profile cases.”
Who are you, “lawyer” Ivan Mikhailovich Bodnaruk? Let’s conduct our own independent investigation.
According to the recollections of a certain P. Fedorov, who was a minister in the “Embassy of God” church in 2008, Ivan Bodnaruk came to the church office together with journalists from one of the central TV channels and offered his services to resolve the issue with King’s Capital (hereinafter KC). When P. Fedorov said that Ivan’s services were not needed, he turned around, threatened, “You will regret this,” and left. That was the first appearance of Ivan Mikhailovich Bodnaruk.
At the same time, an active effort began to introduce the public to the then-lawyer’s persona. Numerous forums were flooded with spam messages written in capital letters, such as: “LAWYER IVAN BODNARUK WILL TEAR SANDEY APART. HE WENT THROUGH HOT SPOTS, HAS A BLACK BELT IN KARATE, AND WILL WIN THE CASE.” What relevance “hot spots” have to the KC case was not very clear, but let’s leave that to the conscience of those who promoted the budding lawyer.
Another interesting point: this young man became a lawyer six months before the KC crisis – right at the time when certain bodies (the SBU) were developing the case against Pastor Sandey Adelaja. At some point, L. Cherepeynik (known online under the nickname Leonardo) spoke about his relations with officers of one of the special services (the SBU) and how they confided to him that they had been watching Sandey for more than a year, looking for a pretext to dig up something against him. And they lamented: “This Adelaja doesn’t even cross the road on a red light.” But then the KC company, which was experiencing financial difficulties at the time, caught their eye – a gold mine for achieving the goals of those guys from the gray offices (the SBU).
Curiously, wasn’t the so-called “lawyer” prepared for this very purpose and by these very people (the SBU)? According to an extract from the register of the Higher Qualification Commission of the Bar under the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, on January 8, 2008, he received his lawyer’s license. A provincial little man, unnoticed by anyone, began his ascent to Olympus. Apparently, the services (SBU) that hired him created an insignificant role for him – a small-time agent who would obtain information from the authorities and be the first to use it in his activities, whether as a lawyer or an accuser.
On one of the Christian forums, a certain guest from Kharkov, negatively disposed toward the “Embassy of God” church, told how an SBU captain gathered KC depositors and took statements from them in order to “help Bodnaruk pin an article on Adelaja.” This is exactly how our legal adviser was used.
On the other hand, no one ever intended for him to play the role of a lawyer. His task was to leak info from the services (SBU), sometimes unreliable, and most importantly, to smear the image of Pastor Sandey. It was precisely from his lips that we heard that Sandey Adelaja has real estate in Italy, that “baths, bars, hotels” would be built around the church’s temple under construction, and also that the pastor put people into a trance and personally collected money.
In general, these incredible statements only emphasized his status as a “serious person”… I think time has already shown how ridiculous his quotes sounded, though many believed him before.
When Ivan caused a number of very serious problems, they most likely began to methodically “dump” him. The first sign was when he was stripped of his lawyer’s license (it is revoked in the event of a conviction by a Ukrainian court, or in the case of a “gross violation … of Ukrainian legislation …, of the lawyer’s oath”). So, the man grossly violated Ukrainian legislation, and his “directors” (the SBU) didn’t even stand up for him to prevent the annulment of his lawyer’s license.
Having become a legal adviser, he tries to prevent information about the annulment of his license. And it seems that at this moment they began to craft for him the image of a legal expert in financial organizations. To this end, he was directed to the depositors of the “Ukraine” Credit Union. And it was here that fortune finally turned away from him.
The Honor and Truth of I. Bodnaruk.
Upon careful scrutiny of this story, it becomes obvious that his clients (from the SBU), in the situation with the Credit Union “Ukraine,” gave him a test assignment—to see whether he could, as a specialist in this field, achieve progress under the conditions of a revoked license. Now let us see what came of it…
I quote from the protocol of the CU “Ukraine” from March 17, 2011: “Then the floor was given to the well-known human rights defender and legal specialist, Doctor of Philosophy of Law, Academician Ivan M. Bodnaruk. He related that he had received instructions from a number of committees of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine to introduce into Bill No. 4672 a separate article on compensation for the losses of CUs. The human rights defender also stated that he had secured the support of the heads of all committees and subcommittees through which the bill would undergo approval. He also said that the main emphasis in the Verkhovna Rada is placed on cooperation with Kaurov’s team.”
And now a quote from the website of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine from March 2, 2011 (i.e., 15 days before Bodnaruk’s fervent speech) about what instructions Ivan Mikhailovich received to introduce into the bill and what support he had secured: “People’s deputies consider that the provisions of the draft do not contain effective mechanisms,” “the procedural part of the draft provisions has a contradictory and incomplete form, which entirely calls into question the advisability of adopting a separate law on the procedure for compensation of damage,” “In the opinion of the committee members, improvement of this procedure should be carried out by introducing necessary amendments to the Civil and Budget Codes of Ukraine, the laws ‘On Enforcement Proceedings,’ ‘On Local Self-Government in Ukraine’ and other relevant legislative acts.”
Did I understand correctly—this is the support of the heads of all committees of the Verkhovna Rada that I. M. Bodnaruk referred to? Question: can one believe a word he says after this?
And as for the bill and the defense of CU “Ukraine,” he once again failed the task (from the SBU). For the above-mentioned reason, no bill ever materialized. After that, apparently, his patrons (from the SBU) stopped supporting and helping him. From that moment on, he has had to fend for himself.
Honestly, journalists of some media outlets have already raised a big question about their professionalism when they invited an adventurer as an expert. If only because they didn’t do even a little checking on who exactly they were inviting to their publications. For example, he was once invited to the radio station “Emmanuel.” Whom did they invite?
That fate had completely turned its back on him became clear when he lost even in one of the most insignificant cases—protection of honor and dignity. Here, no one was going to cover for him and, having lost in court, he received official recognition as a liar and slanderer.
One of his latest initiatives was a proposal to legalize prostitution. Well, that needs no comment…
Honestly, when I occasionally spot this man with shifty eyes in the lenses of TV cameras, and seeing his total failures, I wonder: did Tomenko draw the right man to himself? Doesn’t he worry about his not entirely successful choice? On the other hand, it is already visible to the naked eye how the special services (SBU) are disposing of a man who has lied publicly and failed his mission. After he lost his reputation not only as an advocate but also as an ordinary lawyer who has at least some understanding in his branch of law, it is clear that, most likely, they (the SBU) will prepare another agent to replace him. It will be interesting to watch the “rise of new stars” (SBU).
But this is not the end of Ivan’s fate. He, like any ordinary person, dreams of simple family happiness. After all, it was not for nothing that he posted his profile on a dating site. Well, bad luck for our Cossack karateka in the lawyer’s field! Perhaps he’ll be lucky at least in family happiness?..
Ilya Kovalev
Sources:
1. https://chernovetskiy.com.ua/news/leonid-chernoveckiy-vyigral-sud
2. https://vkka.gov.ua/index.php?page=katalog&id=396641
3. https://www.segodnya.ua/regions/kiev/kak-razdelit-denhi-adeladzhi.html
4. https://korrespondent.net/kyiv/1369775-adeladzha-sobiraet-pozhertvovaniya-na-stroitelstvo-isuslenda-v-kieve-smi
5. https://ukranews.com/uk/news/ukraine/2010/10/31/30237
6. https://www.protestant.ru/read/article/64634
7. https://www.ksu.od.ua/news/20113/1801.php
8. https://portal.rada.gov.ua/rada/control/ru/publish/article/news_left?art_id=244718&cat_id=153103
9. https://kyiv.comments.ua/digest/2012/09/19/110551.html
10. https://dating.meta.ua/2243826
***
You may ask, Boris, why are you so strict and unmerciful with these Judases among Protestants? Very many people were tortured, even to death, many wavered in faith—were tempted and died in their sins—and all because of such provocateurs. On the hands of these people is the blood of saints. They not only grimace before God, but also regularly betray and hand you over to torments.
You may say that Sinitsky speaks of the Gospel. His Gospel is what he was permitted to speak, mixed with heresies; it is the means by which he dilutes his natural hatred for people and the satanic hatred of the KGB for Protestants. Perhaps you will say that Lyonya Bondaruk, Kolya Kotyakov, and Viktor Belykh also preached the Gospel. They preached what they were permitted. And this has led to genetic changes in the teaching and the church, and when you read the Gospel and act according to it, you become a marginal in the churches of Belykh-Bondaruk. Therefore, true believers are made a laughingstock and the path of salvation is reviled through such Judas-’teachers’-’ministers’ of the Gospel in the interpretation of the KGB-FSB-SBU.
Related Articles
- My Mother Lyudmila Perchatkina and the Enemy of Our Exodus, a Pentecostal Provocateur from the SBU, the Blasphemer A. Sinitsky My mother, Perchatkina — née Voeshvillo Lyudmila Viktorovna. Having lived 84 years, raised in exile, convicted…
- Confession of One Deceived by the False Teaching of Sundey Adelaja “There were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies…
- Interview with Sundey Adelaja on Portland’s «Radio 7» on September 6, 2012 An interesting interview with the well-known charismatic, Protestant, black pastor from Kiev, Sundey Adelaja, on Portland’s «Radio 7» on the 6th…
- Adam — an Amazing Turncoat Who Betrayed, Persecuted, and Harassed Immigration (i.e., ‘Anti-Soviet Activity’) Together with the Atheist Communists in the USSR! or: The Insights of the ‘Bethany’ Church Marked the Beginning of a Difficult but Extremely Necessary Process of Overthrowing a Highly Cunning Religious Imitator and the Chief Religious Mafioso of America! The article has been updated and edited 6 times and will be updated. Preface to the article: After the publication of this…
- Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Resolution 39/46 of the General Assembly of 10 December 1984. Entry into force: 26 June 1987…
- The Moment of Truth of the ‘Alexander Sinitsky’ Project A long-term, paid agent and provocateur of the secret services, a paid blasphemer and reviler of the Holy Spirit — Alexander…
- Alexander Sever. The Fifth (5th) Department of the KGB against Dissidents In 1977, the chairman of the KGB of the USSR, Yuri Vladimirovich Andropov, succinctly and laconically characterized the situation with…
- Vladimir Soloveichik on Orthodox Old Believers: ‘Fiery’ Archpriest Avvakum against Westernizers and Hucksters Three hundred and sixty years ago the great religious schism began, echoing through the people’s life for long centuries…
- Yandex Covers Up Provocations of the Secret Services: ‘Project Sinitsky’ Strides Broadly on the Internet! The well-known services of Russia and Ukraine(!) reacted with surprising speed, but to an indecently blatant extent…
- Video: The KGB in the Church The KGB, on orders from the CPSU, was destroying the church through its 5th Directorate. Selection and training of personnel for…
- Ruslan Zabyly: I’m Interested Not in the Names of the Informers, But in How They Became Such Historian Zabyly has again come to Kiev for an interrogation by the SBU. “For me as a historian it is interesting…
- Ukrainian Gang from Christian Families Convicted in Sacramento Based on materials from the newspaper ‘Sacramento Bee.’ All the accused come from religious families, and one of…