Apologetics of the child farm

March 12, 2014 · Adam Bondaruk, Baptists, Victor Belykh, AUCECB, Persecution, Interview, KGB, Books, Unregistered Pentecostals, Nikolay Kotyakov, On Emigration, United Church of Evangelical Christians, Vestibule, Petr Saenko, Pentecostals, Religious Mafia, Slavik Radchuk, Contemporary Persecution, Security Services

The author of this harsh, sometimes shocking article is Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Director of the Center for the Study of Socially Significant Problems Vladimir Aleksandrovich SURIN. The article “Apologetics of the Detoform” was first published in the last issue of the journal “Political Class” (http://www.politklass.ru/cgi-bin/issue.pl?id=864) with some abridgements.

V.A. Surin We should start with stating two axioms.
First. Scientific and technical progress, the scientific and technical revolution, a colossal growth in labor productivity, an unprecedented in the history of mankind level of development of productive forces, the increased level of material well-being of the population of Europe and the USA have led to the depopulation of Europeans.
Second. The previously unprecedented practice of state stimulation of childbearing, the practice of providing significant monetary payments and a substantial package of social benefits and privileges related to the birth and upbringing of children, have activated the process of physical replacement of depopulating Europeans by non-European migrants. The post-Christian woman does not give birth to children — despite all the payments, benefits and privileges. And conversely, social allowances and child benefits have become the real, sometimes the only, basis of life for millions of large families of migrants in Europe and North America.
Thus, in a situation of economic prosperity of the West, the physical extinction of post-Christian European nations is taking place. Therefore, simply discussing anything without proposing a fundamentally new idea, a new concept for overcoming this physical catastrophe, makes no sense. Finding and uncovering ever new facts and regularities, discovering other secondary interconnections, details and particulars, adding other colors and touches to the description of the physical collapse of Europe — why? For what?
True, it is not entirely accurate to speak of a physical catastrophe of Europe, because there are two European nations that today, on the contrary, are in a state of demographic comfort and prosperity. These are the Albanians and the Turks. This fact is balanced by another, also concerning ethnic Europeans. While the overall US population is growing, the number of white Europeans there is rapidly declining.
That is, a fully politically correct and accurate statement would be the fact of the physical catastrophe of post-Christian nations, including the Russian nation. What is most depressing is the euphoria of self-deception that has gripped Russian society today. How little, it turns out, is needed to pacify the conformist consciousness! The president spoke of the need to solve the demographic problem. And the mass conformist consciousness perceived these words as a kind of advertising cliché: the president did everything right, solved the problem for all of us with his single presidential word. How? Where and in what does this successful solution consist? And can the depopulation of Europeans be stopped at all?
What Putin said and what we all unanimously agreed with has long existed in the West. There is even something more. Namely: the already actually achieved very high life expectancy of Western Europeans. Consequently, the vivid catastrophic example of the West must be taken exactly the opposite — according to the principle “do not do as I do.”
But, it turns out, the problem is not at all in the difficulty of choosing the optimal and correct option, one of many. The problem, alas, is elsewhere — in the absence of choice. A tragic problem. To pay prize money for conception and birth or not to pay? This is the absolutely alternative-free “choice” facing the state in the situation of depopulation of the Russian nation. To do nothing or to establish a “maternity capital”? This is the genuine tragedy of the current moment. The state cannot do nothing and at the same time is unable to actually do something to avoid a national catastrophe.
The situation is looped by the absence of moral and ethical levers of state influence on the family. The state preaching of a truncated “neo-Christianity of demography,” appeals to post-Christians: “Give birth like Christians (or Muslims)” — this is nonsense.
Having pretensions, if not to global domination, then at least to leadership, the West itself, as it turns out, simply cannot achieve a perfect trifle. Namely: the primacy of the man in each individual Western family. The mechanical and unnatural transfer of purely political principles into the family and the replacement of existential laws and foundations of family hierarchy by them have led to the collapse of the “democratic” family and the physical apocalypse of the West — the phenomenon of post-Christian childlessness.
Western “family democracy” as quickly as it was imperceptibly degenerated into existential anarchy, into the primitive everyday, domestic unmanageability of the Western woman. And then from this “trifle” of everyday life grew something that had never existed before — a modern post-Christian female civilization.
It has long been known that any most powerful piece of equipment — a tank, an airplane, etc. — can be easily put out of action with the help of sugar. It is enough to simply pour some amount of it into the fuel tank. Something similar happened to the West. Perceived by many as the headquarters of the all-powerful world backstage, the West is, in reality, dying out in a banal way. And this very primitive depopulation is caused by a completely mundane reason — the inability of the Western man to lead in the family.
Democracy brought in from outside, from the world of politics into the family, became that “sugar” which disabled the engine of traditional civilization of male sexism, after which the process of moral-volitional and psychophysical degradation of the Western man became irreversible.
And therefore the transnational project “Detoform” has no alternative. On what this project represents, we should dwell in more detail.

Detoform: Historical Experience and Modern Prospects

Direct state intervention in childbearing has already occurred in post-Christian history. For instance, in two godless despotisms — Stalin’s USSR and Hitler’s Reich.
Nazi eugenics began to be implemented in the most cynical and readily available manner. With the outbreak of war, the organized mating of young German soldiers on leave with German women became a common, highly encouraged practice. It was precisely mating. The marital status of the “disposable partners,” the status of the child they conceived, and many other moral, ethical, religious, and legal aspects of this problem — all were justified by the state credo: Germany for Germans, Germany above all. At the same time, the Nazis imposed a different demographic formula on all the peoples they subjugated: one family, one child. (Who, then, conquered modern Europe, which lives by that formula even without Hitler?)
Stalin took a different path. An extremely harsh ban on abortion was introduced — and that in the hardest time of post-war devastation.
The problem of migrants — legal, illegal, desirable, undesirable, whatever — is a false and imposed problem. The new Great Migration of Peoples that we are witnessing today is something fundamentally different. It is not at all a migration in search of work. What is taking place is the filling of a physical emptiness, a human vacuum.
America, like a declining Rome, is building its “Hadrian’s Wall,” fencing itself off from Mexico. Why? The reason is banal. Gringo women do not give birth to children. And Latina women do give birth. What then remains — in reality, in practice, and not in the abstract doctrines of the neocons — of the United States’ pretensions to global leadership? Why can the president of the leading superpower not compel, convince, persuade, coerce, etc., white American women to bear children? And why do their darker-skinned neighbors on the continent give birth, and give birth in large numbers, without any presidential intervention at all?
The conclusion from all this is obvious — without the child farm, all white post-Christians are no longer capable of self-reproducing functioning. Before us is an exceedingly stark dilemma: the state child farm or the death of the state, ungovernable depopulation or a state-controlled physical self-replacement of Europeans. And therefore the child farm shall be!
The ideological foundation of the child farm rests on the postulate that father and mother are, in the literal sense, production professions. Henceforth, father and mother are full-time employees of the child farm. And the child farm itself is a clearly organized, centrally managed, continuous-cycle production facility. Here, round the clock, in shifts, within an established eight-hour working day, for decent pay, only highly qualified professionals — physicians, educators, managers, and so on — labor. The professional duty of the mother is conception, gestation, and the birth of an infant. It is inseparably combined with her everyday work in her ordinary role, whether at the child farm or elsewhere. The newborn child is transferred to the child farm, and for this the woman who has given birth immediately receives a fixed monetary reward without delay.
The post-Christian consumer society, by the algorithm of its self-organization, is a great assembly line in which being itself is split up into separate operations, each performed by a professional specialist. Children from now on are no longer an exclusive “piecework commodity,” no longer the unique artifact of a “lone artisan.” Efficient mass child production under the conditions of post-Christian civilization is the only possible means of reproducing one’s own kind. Post-Christianity no longer acknowledges the existential value known as “continuation of the line.” From now on, we can only speak of organizing a high-tech, efficient branch of impersonal, flow-line child production. Only in this way can the fundamental contradiction of the post-Christian era be overcome: children are not needed by the individual post-Christian — children are vitally necessary to the post-Christian state.
The familiar practice of surrogacy is nothing other than a correctly intuited, but not yet sufficiently widespread, model of professional fatherhood and motherhood within the structure of the child farm. The difference — microscopic and non-essential — consists only in the fact that the coming comprehensive surrogacy-based fatherhood and motherhood will become a kind of state order, which will be placed and fulfilled at the child farm.
A real possibility opens up: the scientifically grounded and technologically supported output of child products with predetermined characteristics. Individual enterprises in the network of child farms may be focused on narrow specialization. In some, literally from the moment of conception, for example, athletes will be cultivated, reared, educated, and prepared. In others, everything will be aimed at creating future scientific personnel, and so on.
With such an approach, many social, educational, financial, and other problems simply lose their urgency. And most importantly, the threat of depopulation is removed, without any changes whatever to the consumerist, hedonistic way of life. And post-Christians gain a real chance for physical survival. The only real chance.

Defamilialization of the Post-Christian West

The physical degeneration of the post‑Christian world manifests itself in the unnatural fusion of the family and society. More precisely — in the dissolution of the family into society and the emergence, as a result of that dissolution, of a politicized anthropo‑sphere. The Western family is a caricature of democracy. It is a democracy governed by the woman, where the man is always the one being led. It is precisely this caricature that has ultimately given rise to the anti‑Christian female civilization.

The same process is going on in Russia as in the West. The only difference is in its speed. Russia, as always, lags behind the less inert West. Unfortunately, in this case the lag proved to be far too insignificant. Russia did not have enough ontological and civilizational inertia to hold itself within the framework of the traditional civilization of male sexism.

Today the fundamental difference between the Western and Byzantine models of theomachy has clearly emerged. The Byzantine theomachy, in the form of Soviet militant atheism, for all its monstrousness and cruelty, nevertheless remained within the traditional ontological framework of male sexism.

The postulate of “male atheism” — God does not exist — is the formula for denying the existence of God. The existence of God the Father, God the Son, and the Holy Spirit is denied. It is the very existence of the Holy Trinity that is denied. It should be especially emphasized: in Orthodoxy the Holy Trinity is also defined by the masculine gender.

We observe an entirely different picture in the West. The de‑Christianization of the West has been the result of the powerful impact of “soft” female theomachy.

In Europe and America churches were not blown up, as they were in the USSR. Churches in the West simply emptied. Silently, without words, millions upon millions of people left the Church. And the Western phenomenon of de‑Christianization lies in the fact that it was precisely women who were in the forefront of those who left the Church.

God the Father, God the Son, and the Holy Spirit. He, He, and He.
— No! I, the Western Woman, resolutely reject such a “male God”!

Deacon, pastor, priest, bishop, apostle… He, he, he!
— No! I, the Western Woman, resolutely reject such a “male Church”!

… “and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee” (Gen. 3:16).
… “And they that had eaten were about five thousand men, beside women and children” (Mt. 14:21).
— No! I, the Western Woman, resolutely reject such a “male Religion”!

The Russian proverb, “A soft bed makes a hard sleep,” very precisely expresses the character and specificity of the Western “female theomachy.”

The post‑Christian God of the modern West is literally she (!). A God of the feminine gender. A Woman.

The post‑Christian Gospel has been meticulously reinterpreted and rewritten in the spirit of female sexism. And, finally, the Western Church itself has fallen victim to the struggle for women’s rights (?!). For in Europe and America a female priesthood has been established and is growing ever stronger.

Softly and imperceptibly a genuine civilizational upheaval has taken place. As a result, the Western post‑Christian civilization has degenerated into the Civilization of Female Theomachy. And modern Western society, in an ontological sense, has turned into a society of the absolute power of the Anti‑Christian Matriarchy. A non‑traditional society of dominant female sexism.

The vector of development of this new society is such that in the very near future the West will become entirely childless, and the Roman See will be occupied by Mama of Rome.

Today, Islam is proving historically successful primarily not as a Religion, but as an ideological Citadel of traditional ontological male sexism. Ordinary Europeans, native “ethnic Christians,” when converting to Islam, do so above all for existential reasons. For in the reality of the Western Female Civilization, only Islam guarantees and enables the Western Man to regain his role and status as Leader in the Family. Living today side by side with Muslim migrants, Western Europeans find only in their living example the direct path to restoring the traditional family Hierarchy.

The West, as it turned out, absolutized the role of scientific and technological progress. Looking down arrogantly on the “third world,” the West was confident that the historical rivalry of Civilizations takes the form of a comparison: civilization of progress versus civilization of survival.

However, it turned out that at the center of the wretched hut lies not a “hole in the floor” at all, but something entirely different. Namely: the Family. And, conversely, Western civilization has ultimately been reduced to a civilization of mass domestic comfort, essentially a “sewerage civilization.” The civilizational pride of the West has turned into its ontological fiasco. The catastrophe of childlessness.

Since “God is dead,” the Family has also died. For: there are no longer any unified criteria, no rigid hierarchy. Any and every opinion of a free individual, including on the criteria of truth and the essence of hierarchy — from now

Civilization of Orgasm

In the Christian worldview, control over conception is ruled out by definition. The emergence of post-Christian civilization, however, is marked by uncontrolled abortive control, an anarchy of contraception, and the virtual refusal of Western women to conceive and bear children. Abortion and contraception killed first feminine, and then religious morality. The era of post-Christian female civilization began with the disappearance of a woman’s natural fear of being left alone with an illegitimate child in her arms. This truth is as obvious as it is rigidly tabooed by an unspoken “feminine censorship.”
It is telling how closely de-familization and moral degradation are intertwined in modern society.
A woman in a lawful, well-off marriage leaves her newborn at the maternity hospital. The post-Christian state and society grant her that right.
And the woman exercises it.
Grown, financially secure children send their parents to a retirement home. The modern state and society grant them that right.
And they use it.
Materially successful, perfectly healthy spouses, fully capable by all medical indications of childbearing, consciously and categorically refuse to have children. No one condemns them. For it is their legal right.
A pregnant married woman unilaterally decides to have an abortion. Liberal state and society have granted her that right. And she uses it.
Before us is but a tiny fraction of the open-ended list of legal “demographic freedoms” that are leading Europeans to inevitable physical extinction. History has repeatedly shown how necessary it is at critical moments to ask uncomfortable questions. “Demographic policy” – let us read closely, let us think deeply about this very untraditional concept. What lies behind it? If we discard politically correct hypocrisy, the answer is clear: a daily generated problem of a woman’s personal choice. A choice between contraception (abortion) and conception.
Is this the sphere into which the state is now forced to intrude! And what is the toolkit of state intervention – as opposed to surgical intervention? Money. Money against the scalpel. To give birth or not to give birth – is that a political problem?
How to make money work directly in order to avoid demographic catastrophe – that today is the genuine problem. How to really increase the birth rate under conditions where the European woman can be neither forced nor persuaded to give birth?
How to make money work directly amid the de-familization of society? The democratic secular state has legalized, absolutized, and made into a nationwide categorical imperative the right of a woman to dispose of her body. And what if, here too, at this most fundamental point, we stop lying? What if, instead of inventing politicized neologisms and politically correct terminological myth-making, we return to traditional, plain Russian speech?
So, a woman is free to dispose of her body. To anyone who knows the Russian language, it is clear that this is apparently a declaration of a woman’s right to engage in prostitution. Moreover, in addition to the de facto right to trade her own body, the state also endows a woman with the legal right to self-mutilation. The human embryo, not yet a member of the consumer society, is not recognized as a human being. The human child in the mother’s womb is not a person. It is a part of the woman’s body. And of this part of her body the woman has the legal right to rid herself. To remove it by means of surgical operation. And is a problem of mass removal of any other healthy parts of a woman’s body even possible in principle? This question is not absurd. Is the fetus in the mother’s womb (a fertilized pregnant woman is already a mother!) some kind of unhealthy growth? An unexpectedly arisen unnatural physical deformity? A malignant neoplasm? And pregnancy – is it not, in and of itself, an illness?
Behind these deliberately pointed paradoxical questions it is easy to discern the god of the Western childless civilization, whose name is orgasm. And the countless embryoform “body parts” of women are sacrifices to this insatiable deity. The cause of the physical catastrophe of modern Western civilization is that it is a civilization of orgasm. The entire value system of the West revolves around its peculiar sun – the sexual act solely for the sake of orgasm, “purified” of conception by infanticide. Not by abstinence does the West control the birth rate, but by infanticide. Assertions that contraception is supposedly not abortion are relapses of conscience. Mythology always gravitates toward new, pretty words, toward “myths in themselves.” The Western mythology of freedom – especially so. Thus sodomites become gays, suicide becomes euthanasia. Sounds beautiful, does it not?
Practically all female contraceptives, including the so-called IUD and hormonal preparations, have a pronounced abortive principle of action. The IUD provokes an artificial miscarriage of an already conceived child. The use of hormonal pills causes artificial atrophy of the endometrium; the living embryo is rejected by the mother’s organism and perishes. The statistics of maternal infanticide are also known: on average, a “civilized woman” kills 12–13 infants a year in the womb with contraceptives. Truly, King Herod with his slaughter of the Bethlehem innocents is himself an “infant” compared to the sinister figure of the Western mother of one child.
The morbidly unnatural cult of the beautiful lady in the realities of the one-dimensional utilitarian consumer society has turned out to be a lethal leaven, degenerating the post-Christian civilization of “soft theomachism” into a glamorous pseudo-civilization, all of whose historical meanings have been cut off or lost and reduced to a single thing – the greatest facilitation of female orgasm without childbearing.
The history of Western civilization provides, as “food for thought,” among other things, the fact of the emergence of the phenomenon of the meal without satiation. The use of technology for consuming food for the pleasure of its taste, when the meal can go on for as long as one wishes. Let us recall ancient Rome in its decline. On the tables of the nobility, vases with peacock feathers become a common attribute. Gluttony, overeating – these vices nevertheless always included a natural monolithic cycle: food intake – satiation.
Decline, degradation, degeneration begin and manifest themselves when the goal becomes the bare “gastronomic orgasm.” With an aesthetically beautiful instrument, the vomiting reflex is artificially induced. From then on, the consumption of food can continue endlessly. For the very order of things is destroyed. A hedonistic breakthrough beyond the bounds of nature has been accomplished. Gluttony, as such, no longer exists! Perversion has achieved identity with pleasure, in this case gastronomic.
The glamorous pseudo-term “sexual revolution” signifies and reveals the subliminal urge of a degenerated West to pass off the desired as the real. Female orgasm for the sake of orgasm; orgasm without pregnancy; female orgasm unnaturally equated with male orgasm; orgasm “cleansed” of childbearing by the institution of legal infanticide – this is something beyond the pale. Beyond the bounds of primordial being. The emergence and entrenchment of the Civilization of Orgasm and Abortion is an existential catastrophe for post-Christian Europe.
What we have is a closed-loop, one-dimensional tautology: freedom in pleasure – pleasure in freedom. His Wretchedness the Consumer, having identified freedom with pleasure, has created a monstrous non-traditional civilization of Abortion and Orgasm. A civilization that formerly consisted of Church-Kitchen-Children has degenerated into one big Kitchen. Where people, in an indiscriminate mix, eat, drink, and have sex. The television set standing right there broadcasts the same. And since this is the Kitchen, Woman rules there. Childless (and often husbandless). An Amazon, the meaning and goal of whose life is Orgasm, and the main life-decoration is Career. The kitchen apron is henceforth the chief and inalienable accessory of the Western male suit.
The civilizational fiasco of the Western male is an established, accomplished fact. The post-Christian Amazons have forced the Western male from a leader into a manager, called to provide the Western woman with orgasm for the sake of orgasm. Orgasm without childbearing. Orgasm as a way of life. The West has come close to the “final solution of the child question.”
The Child-Farm project is doomed to be accepted for implementation. For it saves the earthly post-Christian post-industrial “paradise” from physical death. You’ve worked your prescribed eight hours – then enjoy comfort, wealth, and freedom. You are a successful professional. To feed, swaddle, heal, bring up, and educate children – that is the business of other professionals.
The Civilization of Comfort is also the Civilization of the Great Conveyor Belt. Everyone must professionally perform that operation for which he has been trained. The lifetime of post-Christians is divided into two equally valued parts: work and leisure. Leisure under conditions of maximum comfort and personal freedom – is it not heavenly bliss? Is it not the goal and meaning of life for a civilized person? And creative and professional self-realization? Is it not important? And, finally, the main thing. Western communism – unlike Soviet communism – has indeed been really, actually built.
And “all it takes” is to urgently save oneself from depopulation. The option of salvation: the Child-Farm.

State Instead of Family

The spiritual relaxation of the West, the comfort of the conformist consciousness of post-Christians, rests on the primitive, widely accessible, stupefying freedom of the existence of a multitude of opinions. For the self-loving His Nothingness the Consumer, it is enough to be aware that his opinion is one among many others. Preference is given to the opinion of the professional, the authority. As a result, everyone is free, everyone is equal, everyone is leveled by a uniform conformist consciousness, all are equidistant from the truth, all are happy outside the truth. (After all, the search for truth is usually and most often very uncomfortable, even tormenting.) And an entirely different state—a state of psychophysical comfort—is provided by the process of choosing one of the multitude of opinions. Choosing in favor of the opinion of the professional with the highest rating.

The conformist spirit deifies the rating of everything and everyone. In a civilization where a multitude of opinions has become identified with a multitude of truths, hierarchy has been reduced to rating. If a certain institution (politician, expert community, media, etc.) speaks of the existence of a particular problem, then it exists. Conversely, if the problem is not formulated, not declared, not brought to the consumer’s attention, it does not exist. At the heart of modern conformist consciousness lies a caricatured paraphrase of the Stalinist ideologeme: no term, no problem. Today there is no term describing the uselessness of children in the era of the civilization of abortion and orgasm. “Family crisis,” “demographic problem”—these politically correct pseudo-terms require no search for truth.

The post-Christian world already possesses all the main components of the global child farm. What is lacking is merely some external pretext to conceptually unite the entire modern infrastructure related to human reproduction and upbringing. And the only real alternative to the child farm is the physical death of post-Christian civilization.

To date, enough has been said about stimulating the birth rate using the so-called maternity capital. But the official comments regarding the three-year delay in the actual disposal of this benefit were literally delivered in a rapid patter, offhandedly and evasively.

Three years is no small period. Every parent knows that precisely the first three years of a newborn’s life are decisive. Both in purely medical terms and in terms of the formation of a future personality. It is precisely at this stage that the family requires guardianship, attention, assistance, and support. And suddenly, a decision on the delay. Why?

Indeed, if from the state’s point of view parents cannot be directly trusted with money for the child, how can they be trusted with the child itself? What problem are we talking about in general? Whom is that vague, self-denigrating, and—most importantly—deceitful patter intended to deceive: “Well, you know what our people are like.” What are they like?

One of the elementary basic characteristics of a normal, fully capable person is the ability to independently and rationally spend money. It is obvious that the state has no claims against society or the citizen regarding “misuse of funds.” Such a problem simply does not exist. But can it exist in principle? It turns out it can.
If society as a whole and each citizen individually do not place childbearing among their significant priority life goals.

There are no budgetary gifts in the form of, say, a housing capital. And if such a truly magical gift were suddenly to become the core of a national project, there would be no problem of its misuse. But the targeted use of maternity capital raises doubts. Thus, starting a family and having children has definitively and irrevocably ceased to be a significant goal. What do the state’s quite well-founded fears about maternity capital tell us?
That children are not needed by the post-Christian consumer society. They are needed only by the state itself.

From both a formal-logical and a religious point of view, the path to physical salvation lies in the spiritual and moral sphere. To stop the process of depopulation, Europeans must become Christians again; a return to the patriarchal family and a ban on abortion and contraception are necessary.

It is indisputable and obvious that precisely this is impossible. Absolutely impossible. Public discussion on the re-Christianization of Europe is also absolutely unacceptable. “Back to Christ” is civilizational regression. The post-Christian world wants and hopes to avoid perishing from primitive depopulation while nevertheless remaining committed to its post-Christian values. Therefore, the child farm is the only chance of survival for Europeans.

As individual links of the future child farm, one should consider already existing extra-familial institutions: kindergartens and nurseries, infant homes, orphanages, boarding schools, summer camps, milk distribution centers, maternity hospitals. Practically everything has long been ready for a transition to an extra-familial industrial model of conception and childbearing. Only one step remains—effectively state-controlled conception.

Undoubtedly, even in the era of defamilization, a child can be born and raised in a family. But this is a purely private matter of the parents, their personal conscious choice. The state, for its part, must openly declare: since the family is de facto a hopeless relic, it is no longer regarded as a priority demographic institution.

The departure of European woman from Christianity and from the family has unlinked heaven and earth. As a result, an unnatural civilization has emerged, suspended between the earthly and the heavenly. Falsely perceiving itself as self-sufficient, this post-Christian civilization has invented its own heaven and earth. Politics became heaven, and economics became earth. And the cycle that determines being—the brief interval from election to election. Earthly well-being turned out to be reduced to successful economic indicators. Economics was entirely identified with earthly existence. As a result, the non-traditional civilization fell victim to its own non-traditionality. Economics and politics became self-valuable and self-sufficient. Consequently, the perishing childless civilization does not sense the approaching death.

Apparently, due to a special Eurasian middle ground, Russia is still capable of discerning this impending threat. That is why it is from Russia that the inevitability of the European child farm is seen especially clearly. Without a child farm, there will be no Europeans.

To each his own.

http://ruskline.ru/analitika/2007/10/10/apologetika\_detofermy/

Print, save, email .pdf