Guard your honor from youth
There’s an old saying: “Guard your honor from a young age…” Have you ever thought about the meaning of these words? V. I. Dal’s dictionary defines “Honor” as “the inner moral dignity of a person, valor, honesty, nobility of soul, and a clear conscience.” A Clear Conscience! That is, living according to the laws of the Family.
Remember, by old concepts, a wife guarded her husband’s honor, and he hers. As it turns out, these are not empty words. Today I want to talk about telegony. Many are already familiar with this concept; let’s try to delve deeper into it. Why does the mass media so insistently impose the cult of sex? Why, on almost all websites, are there banners with naked people? In the end, why is the entire Internet, all television, and all places accessible to large numbers of people so full of pornography, and why do American films engage in huge-scale advertising of a new fashion — that a schoolboy, when leaving school, must lose his virginity?
And so, let us begin…
Practical breeders of purebred domestic animals are familiar with a phenomenon known as “telegony” (from Greek tele – “far off” and gono – “seed”). It refers to a specific type of transmission of hereditary traits. As early as 150 years ago, English horse breeders decided to cross a horse with a zebra. The experiments failed: not a single conception occurred—neither in mares sired by zebra stallions, nor in zebra “mares” paired with thoroughbred stallions. Yet several years later, after purebred stallions were mated with thoroughbred mares that had previously taken part in those experiments, striped (!) foals began to be born. In this way, horse breeders were convinced by practical experience that all of a mare’s previous “husbands” affect her offspring, regardless of whether her “encounters” resulted in foals or not… The same thing happens with pigeon and dog breeding. In elite kennel clubs there is an unwritten rule: if a pedigree bitch becomes pregnant outside the club, the pedigree of her puppies ends there. Experiments with animals carried out by Félix Le Dantec in the 19th century confirmed the phenomenon of telegony. In his book The Individual, Evolution, Heredity and the Neo-Darwinists (Moscow, 1889) Le Dantec devoted an entire chapter to this topic—“Telegony, or the Influence of the First Male.”
Humans as biological beings are not immune to this phenomenon either. It has been empirically established that a woman’s biofield is altered as a result of intimate relations—both energetically and informationally. Her children inevitably inherit the physiological and anthropological traits of the first sexual partner. During physical intimacy, even if contraceptives are used, the partners’ biofields merge. Therefore, a child born to a woman who had premarital relations inherits half of the chromosome set from the “father according to the flesh,” and from the mother’s previous partners—genetic information transmitted at the “biofield” level due to the phenomenon of telegony. The meaning of the old expression “to spoil a girl” primarily points to the fact that a woman receives genetic information that will not necessarily combine harmoniously with the genetic information she will later receive from the father of her children. And this information is transmitted in an invisible, energy-informational way.
A well-known case occurred back in Soviet times. A good family: sober, hardworking, cultured. The children were the same. The eldest son, Alexander, was conscripted into the army for a year right after graduating from university. He served in Kazakhstan, stationed non-stop at a missile site on the steppe. After being discharged into the reserves, he tasted freedom: he got drunk and for the first time in his life became intimate with some local station “girl.” Once he sobered up, he bitterly repented, fearing he might have caught a disease… It was all right. The blow awaited him from another direction—from the side of telegony. His first-born son—he married a fellow student who had waited for him right after the army—horrified the parents and the villagers with his appearance. The boy did not take after his mother, nor his father, but after that station “beauty,” the young man’s first intimate partner. The parents are light-brown-haired, above average height, grey-eyed, slender and handsome; yet their first-born is short, swarthy, with little brown Asian eyes and, for some reason, a small head. The husband began to suspect his wife of infidelity. But there wasn’t a single Asian in the area. There were none in the bride’s lineage, nor in the groom’s. It never entered anyone’s mind that this was the result of the young father’s casual post-service revelry—the consequence of the telegony effect.
The older generation well remembers the surname Lysenko. Trofim Denisovich Lysenko (1898–1976), the scorned Soviet science functionary, Academician, Hero of Socialist Labor. As the Soviet Encyclopedia writes, “a number of Lysenko’s propositions did not receive experimental confirmation or practical application.” Yes, Lysenko’s propositions perhaps did not pass the test of practice (though that assertion is highly debatable). But few know or wish to know that Academician Lysenko’s rejection of the ideas of “reactionary genetics” was based, in part, on the recognition of the phenomenon of telegony. He said that it is not genetics that carries the qualities transmitted by heredity, but a different, deeper natural process! Even then he guessed about a “photonic-genetic transmission” of DNA genes from one partner to another. When a stronger photonic “ghost” of DNA displaces and replaces a weaker one, thereby transmitting its anthropological and physiological traits to the offspring—even across generations. The scientist assigned it the role of what is today called the “biofield.” Lysenko conducted experiments analogous to the practice of telegony, and he wanted to introduce this knowledge from the realm of chance experience of breeders into the national economy. However, he was unable to fully understand this phenomenon. He identified the source of species changes as the environment itself—which is, of course, crude and mistaken—and because things in nature are not so simple, Lysenko’s experiments yielded little. The practical results of the academician’s work turned out to be even less than those of geneticists, who at least discovered the laws of genetics and applied them in practice. But together with Lysenko, telegony was “thrown out” of science as if the baby were tossed with the bathwater. For geneticists are wrong to replace all other laws with the laws of genetics and try to substitute them for deeper, still unknown laws of life-programming, thereby rejecting any further search for the true driver of evolution and the appearance of species. Lysenko and his supporters were looking in the right direction. For example, O.B. Lepeshinskaya believed that “hereditary qualities are transmitted not by chromosomes alone, but by the cell as a whole.” But she, too, was mistaken, for the matter is not about “the cell as a whole,” but about something else—a still unknown mechanism, analogous to the genetic one but deeper. In many of his failures, Lysenko himself is to blame; he discredited himself with statements such as “all science is class-based.” Reading his report, Stalin wrote next to this passage: “Ha-ha-ha! And what about mathematics or Darwinism?” So there is no talk of rehabilitating Lysenko. What must be REHABILITATED is the very skeptical attitude toward militant dogmatic Darwinism, which, after the victory over Lysenko, was thoroughly eradicated from Soviet science, and every doubter was immediately branded as “bald-headed.” Telegony’s “guilt” lies in having called Darwin’s theory of natural selection into question. That is why it was struck from science. This is not the first time that Darwinism has rejected facts and even laws of Nature.
Often, only the negative side is seen in telegony: strange-looking children appear in families, zebra-like foals are born to horses, pigeons produce something no one knows… Lysenko, however, wanted to turn this negative factor into a positive one, to place it in the service of the national economy. The tasks were supremely practical: accelerated selection of wheat and other crops in conditions of food shortage in the country. Even if Lysenko sometimes engaged in speculation (like other state-science bureaucrats), the very direction of his research is not unscientific, as is claimed today at the instigation of Darwinists. Lysenko was odious to them because he opposed their central tenet: the cornerstone concept of Darwinism’s supporters, who believe that all questions of biology are exhausted by genetics. In the phenomenon of telegony, what is at stake is the transmission of hereditary traits precisely through intimate relations. And the whole problem is that this contact is not something primitively genetic, but something far deeper. The point is not the contact of the biological material of father and mother as we know it, but another structure that carries the information. And it is precisely here that the answer to the question of the origin of species and the mechanism of evolution should lie.
Schopenhauer suggested calculating the beginning of an individual’s life from the day his mother first saw his father. Schopenhauer rarely erred, but here he made a gross mistake. Let us correct Schopenhauer and specify that the date of birth of a child should be considered the day when his mother first entered into an intimate relationship. If the first sexual partner was a degenerate, a physiologically defective individual, the result will be one thing; if an “elite subject,” another. In the latter case, even if the woman later has children by a second-rate or third-rate individual, their quality may be substantially higher thanks to that first “contact.” Incidentally, the telegony effect lies at the basis of the “right of the first night,” according to which a feudal lord had the right to spend the first wedding night with the wife of any of his vassals or serfs. Originally, this right arose at a time when feudal lords were indeed a biological elite, and even if conception did not occur, the woman was nonetheless “programmed” for superior offspring. The degradation of the right of the first night began simultaneously with the degradation of the feudal lords, and consequently the feudal system as well…
MAN, like other living beings, consists, besides the body, of another substance that serves as a material (of a different level) carrier of hereditary information. This is his astral essence — let us call it “astral” — which has become the basis for many speculative pseudo-teachings. We deliberately put the word “astral” in quotation marks, since traditionally it was understood as something spiritual, non-material, “from the other world,” an analogue of the soul. However, its real meaning is different: the “astral” is just as material as chromosomes and genes. It is a phenomenon of a biological order, but at a level unknown to biology. It is precisely the “astral” that is both the carrier of biological information and its transmitting link during reproduction. It is the “organizer of matter” into a living body. Let us emphasize: we are not talking about something non-material and non-biological. Such functions can only be performed by biological material. But we have not yet found its carrier. The same was true with the discovery of chromosomes and genes. History may repeat itself: we will find a continuation of this series. The ancient Vedas, as a proto-science, tell us that our material world consists of the gross part “anu,” perceived by the ordinary natural senses of man, and “paramanu” — a “subtle-material,” multidimensional substance. Today science can influence “anu” — the “gross” atomic and molecular composition of the genetic code, which makes possible many discoveries useful for human life. “Paramana,” which carries information about ancestors in the genome of descendants, remains inaccessible to perception for now. Sometimes such information “breaks through” into a person’s ordinary consciousness, and he recalls his past births, foreign languages he never studied, and, to the surprise of those around him, describes situations from the distant past…
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor Vladimir Barabash, in an interview with a newspaper, rightly says: “Our ancestors knew a priori an elementary rule of genetics: a woman’s first sexual contact leaves an indelible mark on her genetic inheritance system for the rest of her life. It is not only that hormones and potent enzymes enter the body, altering the hereditary mechanism until the end of the childbearing period.” Marital fidelity and maidenly honor are the genetic basis of family happiness and the happy future of parents and their children. This is the foundation of the strength not only of family foundations but also of the genetic continuity of the nation’s and the state’s health and well-being. That is precisely why all the world’s leading religions call for preserving and strengthening male and female morality in the family and the state. That is why parliamentarians are obliged to strengthen the legislative framework for combating prostitution and pimping, to find effective ways to suppress the modern slave trade, as a result of which hundreds of thousands of young women and teenage girls from Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova are taken to brothels throughout the “civilized world.” A shameful fact for the Fatherland, for our national pride. Otherwise, we face a further decline in the quality of the nation, expressed in two notable components: a decrease in the number of intellectuals (as a result of the reduction in the number of strong individuals) and the degradation of the ruling stratum. It is known that this led to the disappearance of the Great Roman Empire. As King Solomon used to say, “When the wicked increase, transgression increases.” It is high time we reflected on this subject. Take care of yourselves and your Kin!
No similar articles